Deconstructing The Basic Human View
History “His story” is an account of the past or everything before the present as man has documented it, through the actions and eyes of man.
A collection of memories from man and woman documented in an attempt to clarify who we are and who we’ve been.
History changes often with each coming perspective given that deems itself worthy enough to be applied and more so by those that choose to accept it.
If the events in your life were told by every person witnessing it as it happened do you think every verbal or written account from each individual would be the same?
Would the accuracy of it be based upon facts or opinions from each individual?
Would there be pieces that were missing or extra pieces being added?
If it is your history wouldn’t the only reliable source from perspective’s respective standpoint be you?
For example, the game “Chinese Whispers” or “Telephone” begins when a player whispers a statement into the ear of another player and it gets passed on to the next player until it reaches the last individual, the beginning statement has often been butchered into something else that doesn’t resemble the beginning players’ original statement.
If viewed in this manner then does there stand any true reliability in the accounts given by others?
Must there be a direct correlation between the source(s) and the informant?
Must the informant be non-biased and able to give from the source(s) in a manner that cannot be deemed as tampered with?
Understanding the history of man in itself we know that the reliability of humans to maintain a pure construct of the things done and seen has often been weakened by various factors.
Whether you choose to accept each ideological, philosophical, or theological theory is up to you.
Acceptance is a key part of how your view of history is painted.
Often humans tend to accept what is most feasible to their thoughts/views, choosing to allow their reality and history to be created for them instead of challenging it.
With the evolution of man through each time period, a rift begins to grow between those stagnant in time and those that ascension allows to see behind the veils of “history”, “life”, and even “death”.
That same evolution forces you to advance or leads to becoming lost in the many distractions that come as offspring of each generation.
Understand that history is being created every moment in time, your present is the past for the future.
Just as the accounts of your life will either be documented by others to tell or by the source to give as a recollection so will history.
History can only be a mass collection of events in time as given from the perspective of those that were there as witnesses and from the opinions of those in the present looking to clarify past events.
Would that, in turn, mean that we are “history” living out itself, inside of itself, telling of itself?
From this view would only those truthfully narrating it and causing effective changes in it truly be a part of it?
Would that make everything opposite of the truth a premeditated anomaly to cause truth to press itself out more vigorously than before?
If everything works out as it is meant to be are the moments in history already planned courses?
Does this deem any of the previous assumptions as to who we are factual?
Only if you accept it as such.
